Monday, March 2, 2015

Parenting Then and Now: A Just Precaution or a Paranoid Reaction?



After reading The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger, I continued to reflect upon the way childhood has changed over the course of the last century. Last year I wrote an essay for Ms. Linder discussing the portrayal of a utopia in a certain novel, but I also touched on childhood and how it has developed to what it is in our society. While researching material for this essay I stumbled across an article from The Atlantic titled “The Overprotected Kid.” Although it’s very long, I would definitely recommend you read it (or at least watch the three minute video linked below this paragraph). In summary, Hanna Rosin observes and writes about how the preoccupation with safety has stripped childhood of independence, risk taking, and discovery. She writes, “Actions that would have been considered paranoid in the ’70s—walking third-graders to school, forbidding your kid to play ball in the street, going down the slide with your child in your lap—are now routine. In fact, they are the markers of good, responsible parenting." Now, I definitely think this is true. You never see children playing in a park these days without a parent supervising or walking home from school by themselves. In The Catcher in the Rye, written in the 1950’s, we see that kids are much less supervised in comparison to today. The young boy playing and singing while walking behind his parents next to a large road or Phoebe’s friend skating in the park by herself on a gloomy day are just a few examples of the independence young children are offered. When narrating, Holden even describes the skate park as “lousy” and full of “dog crap, and globs of spit, and cigar butts from old men, and the benches all looked like they’d be wet if you sat down on them. It made you depressed and every once in a while, for no reason, you got goose flesh while you walked.” This is not a place I would send my kid, alone or even with me. What changed throughout the 20th and 21st centuries that caused parents to become more protective?


I remember when I was younger my parents would let my siblings and I roam our apartment complex for hours at a time during the summer. I would say we lived on the border of “good Urbana” and “bad Urbana.” There was a decent amount of crime and rambunctious high school students walking through our yard area during the school year. For some reason, my parents were totally encouraging of the fact that we would disappear off with our friends literally for hours. I remember that one summer we created this secret lair in the space between our apartment’s wooden fence and the chain link fence of a private house. The space was about five feet wide and filled with prickly tree branches. We decorated the space with the items that our neighbors would throw out. Yes, we dumpster dove, but in my defense these items were really nice. All of our neighbors were from Turkey and basically had to throw out everything they couldn’t bring back with them. We scored an epic ceramic horse head statue once. To say the least, our lair was sketchy and I’m surprised we didn’t get tetanus. However, reading further in Hanna Rosin’s article I found out that this is exactly the type of environment that children should be encouraged to play in (well, minus the dumpster-diving and potential tetanus).

In the article, Hanna Rosin explores and discusses a newly built special park, ominously called “The Land.” It’s a junkyard-looking piece of land where children can create their own play structures using wooden pallets, tires, fire pits, and other material that would normally be considered hazardous. Children are supervised by only one parent and aren’t coddled or helped when they fall and start crying. Rosin writes in her article that children are less constrained and create their own games and groups using their imagination. Surprisingly, the amount of injuries in our normal safety oriented playgrounds is exactly the same as the number of injuries in more “dangerous” ones. This is the kind of environment that I see Holden, and porbably more lower-class individuals from The Catcher in the Rye, playing in. Phoebe seems to be more reigned in by her parents, but still walks by herself to school and the library.

Would you let your young sibling or future child wander “The Land?”
Were you raised in an overprotective household?
What do you think about overprotective parenting? Is it a just precaution or a paranoid reaction?

5 comments:

  1. I just read a short article about this subject in The New Yorker the other day! It talked about a growing movement these days called (hilariously, in my opinion) the Free-Range Kids movement (exactly what it sounds like). Anyway, I'm going to take the middle road here and say that the parenting mentality these days isn't completely, 100% irrational paranoia -- kids probably ARE a lot safer these days because they don't get to wander on the outskirts of a busy New York City street (as Holden watches that one kid do in Catcher). But like many social reforms, maybe the initial kneejerk reaction was too extreme—I remember reading once about a case where parents protested having wood chips on a playground because their kids might get splinters—and in fact we're now seeing some backlash.

    I think this is also related to another parenting mentality we see today: the overbearing Tiger Mom parenting attitude. The vibe I'm kind of picking up on when it comes to this kind of parenting is that these parents, well aware of how competitive the world is and how many potential hazards there are, create so sanitized and structured a world for their kids that there's no way they can fail. I know this is kind of different from the overprotective parents thing you talk about here, but it seems like both parenting philosophies come from the same fundamental place.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "create so sanitized and structured a world for their kids that there's no way they can fail"

      And not only is this potentially physically bad for the kid (less exposure to diseases, less activity, etc.) but it's potentially mentally damaging to the kid as well (my fondest memories of childhood were all outside, not inside).

      Delete
  2. Looking back on my childhood I think I wasn't per say over protected but was more stunned by circumstance as I suffered form a larger phenomenon of not living in a neighborhood with any other kids. Most of my time was spent at or around my house when I was in elementary school because I had nowhere else to go (a destination being a requirement for going out), and anytime I did go anywhere I was occupied by a parent because they had to either guide or drive me across town or another neighborhood dividing mine from my friend's. I didn't start having hours of freedom and exploration until middle school when me and my friends would aimlessly roam the downtown and campus areas after school in search of something to do, or at the very least something that looked different from what we knew and where lived. But period of freedom also ended relatively quickly because those free hours were taken up by sports, homework and other preparatory school like activities when I came to uni. Not only did this bring an end to my ability to experience the world without being answerable for a specific destination, person, and time, but also created a huge divide between the schedules of myself and the close friends I would have done this with that im still trying to recover from to this day. I was allowed free time and space but in circumstance which essentially bared that time from being especially far from home.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Society (especially western society) has simply gotten more paranoid, the media is a large culprit.

    While I think that "You never see children playing in a park these days without a parent supervising or walking home from school by themselves." is rather hyperbolic and not totally true, something less radical like "significantly less children play in a park" I would very much agree with. I agree with the general premise of that statement.

    The fact is: crime is way lower than it was decades ago. I'd send my kids to the park Holden describes. The more we shut kids inside the more damage we do to them. Go let them get dirty, get a little cut by some glass in the sand pit, etc.

    While I didn't have the freedom to go skating downtown New York City as a kid, I still hiked to some parks/woods nearby and had a lot of completely unsupervised adventures. The adventures I had in those woods are some of the fondest memories I have, despite being filled with tons of of broken glass, mud, rivers, tree climbing, swords/knives(found a rusty machete and another steel sword!), dead animals, etc.

    "The Land" feels very phony to me. It feels like a "progressive society" trying to replicate that true exploration of childhood. Get rid of the adult supervisor. Let the kids go off on their own and explore. It feels like a science experiment, not childhood.

    The world's a dangerous place, but it's as safe as it's ever been. Let the kids explore and live naturally.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with your comment, especially the part about the media influencing our perceptions. Bad news sells and good news doesn't, and with the advent of the internet and the widespread sharing of information, now more than ever people can watch and read about horrible things if they want to.

      Delete